page list

27 Apr 2020

Covid-19 listed in 2010 and the legal regulations and laws, proving the actions of government to be criminal


Covid-19 was listed back in 2010 + the legal regulations and laws proving the actions of government and state to be criminal

Covid 19 listed on a official government document from 2010 proving that they committed a crime by disposing of the bodies of the dead who's deaths were attributed to the covid 19 claiming they were not a notifiable disease when clearly the facts prove from their own website .gov.uk and data that it was, i think the government has been taken over and is being run by some one who doesn't know what they are doing clearly, its the only explanation for why all the illegal "legal" documents they are producing do not read like a legalese doc, it reads like pig shit and doesn't even resemble an actual working legal framework, like the latest amendments they "allow" 2 excuses for being outside your own home, by definition "excuse" means you have done something wrong and are trying to justify it, see what i mean peeps changing the definition of words and medical terms to suit this fucking bullshit narrative isn't very legal now is it?.

At 6.15pm on 5 March 2020, a statutory instrument was made into law that adds COVID-19 to the list of notifiable diseases and SARS-COV-2 to the list of notifiable causative agents.

This change was made by adding them to the Health Protection (Notification) Regulations 2010.
This change in law requires GPs to report all cases of COVID-19 to Public Health England.


Registered medical practitioners: report notifiable diseases

Registered medical practitioners (RMPs) have a statutory duty to notify the ‘proper officer’ at their local council or local health protection team (HPT) of suspected cases of certain infectious diseases.

List of notifiable diseases

Diseases notifiable to local authority proper officers under the Health Protection (Notification) Regulations 2010:

Acute encephalitis
Acute infectious hepatitis
Acute meningitis
Acute poliomyelitis
Anthrax
Botulism
Brucellosis
Cholera
COVID-19👈👈👈 Boom 
Diphtheria
Enteric fever (typhoid or paratyphoid fever)
Food poisoning
Haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS)
Infectious bloody diarrhoea
Invasive group A streptococcal disease



The Health Protection (Notification) Regulations 2010

You are here:


Duty to notify suspected disease, infection or contamination in dead persons

3.—(1) A registered medical practitioner (R) must notify the proper officer of the relevant local authority where R has reasonable grounds for suspecting that a person (P) whom R is attending has died whilst

(a)infected with a notifiable disease;

(b)infected with a disease which, in the view of R, presents or could present, or presented or could have presented (whilst P was alive), significant harm to human health; or

(c)contaminated in a manner which, in the view of R, presents or could present, or presented or could have presented (whilst P was alive), significant harm to human health.

(2) The notification must include the following information insofar as it is known to R—

(a)P’s name, date of birth and sex;
(b)P’s date of death;
(c)P’s home address including postcode;
(d)P’s place of residence at time of death (if different from home address);

(e)P’s NHS number;
(f)P’s occupation at time of death (if R considers it relevant);
(g)the name, address and postcode of P’s place of work or education at the time of death (if R considers it relevant);
(h)P’s relevant overseas travel history;
(i)P’s ethnicity;
(j)the disease or infection which P had or is suspected of having had or the nature of P’s contamination or suspected contamination;
(k)the date of onset of P’s symptoms;
(l)the date of R’s diagnosis; and
(m)R’s name, address and telephone number.

(3) The notification must be provided in writing within 3 days beginning with the day on which R forms a suspicion under paragraph (1).

(4) Without prejudice to paragraph (3), if R considers that the case is urgent, notification must be provided orally as soon as reasonably practicable.

(5) In determining whether the case is urgent, R must have regard to—

(a)the nature of the suspected disease, infection or contamination;

(b)the ease of spread of that disease, infection or contamination;

(c)the ways in which the spread of the disease, infection or contamination can be prevented or controlled; and

(d)P’s circumstances (including age, sex and occupation).

(6) This regulation does not apply where R reasonably believes that the proper officer of the relevant local authority has already been notified with regard to P and the suspected disease, infection or contamination by another registered medical practitioner in accordance with this regulation or regulation 2(1).

(7) In this regulation—

“notifiable disease” has the same meaning it has in regulation 2; and

“relevant local authority” means the local authority within whose area R attended P on the occasion of forming a suspicion under paragraph (1).

Duty to provide information to the Health Protection Agency

5.—(1) This regulation applies where a notification has been made by the operator of a diagnostic laboratory to the Health Protection Agency under regulation 4.

(2) The Health Protection Agency may request that the person (R) who solicited the laboratory test which identified the causative agent to which the notification relates, provide to it the information listed at regulation 4(2) insofar as that information was not included in the notification.

(3) R must provide the information requested under paragraph (2) insofar as it is known to R.

(4) The information must be provided in writing within 3 days beginning with the day on which the request is made.

(5) Without prejudice to paragraph (4), if the Health Protection Agency considers the case to be urgent and informs R of this fact when making the request, the information must be provided orally as soon as reasonably practicable.

(6) In determining whether the case is urgent, the Health Protection Agency must have regard to

(a)the nature of the causative agent to which the notification relates;
(b)the nature of the disease which the causative agent causes;
(c)the ease of spread of the causative agent;
(d)the ways in which the spread of the causative agent can be prevented or controlled; and
(e)where known, the circumstances of the person from whom the sample was taken (including age, sex and occupation).

Duty on the relevant local authority to disclose notification to others

6.—(1) This regulation applies where the proper officer of a local authority has received a notification under regulation 2 or 3.

(2) The proper officer of the local authority must disclose the fact of the notification and its contents to

(a)the Health Protection Agency;
(b)the proper officer of the local authority in whose area P usually resides (if different); and
(c)the proper officer of the port health authority or local authority in whose district or area a ship, hovercraft, aircraft or international train is or was situated from which P has disembarked (if known to the disclosing proper officer and if that officer considers disclosure appropriate).

(3) The disclosure must be made in writing within 3 days beginning with the day that the proper officer receives the notification.

(4) Without prejudice to paragraph (3), if the disclosing proper officer considers that the case is urgent, disclosure must be made orally as soon as reasonably practicable.

(5) In determining whether a case is urgent, the disclosing proper officer must have regard to—

(a)the nature of the disease, infection or contamination or the suspected disease, infection or contamination notified;
(b)the ease of spread of the disease, infection or contamination;
(c)the ways in which the spread of the disease, infection or contamination can be prevented or controlled; and
(d)where known, the patient’s circumstances (including age, sex and occupation).

Duty to notify causative agents found in human samples


4.—(1) The operator of a diagnostic laboratory must notify the Health Protection Agency(6) in accordance with this regulation where the diagnostic laboratory identifies a causative agent in a human sample.

(2) The notification must include the following information insofar as it is known to the operator of the diagnostic laboratory—

(a)name and address of the diagnostic laboratory;
(b)details of the causative agent identified;
(c)date of the sample;
(d)nature of the sample;
(e)name of person (P) from whom the sample was taken;
(f)P’s date of birth and sex;
(g)P’s current home address including postcode;
(h)P’s current residence (if not home address);
(i)P’s ethnicity;
(j)P’s NHS number; and
(k)the name, address and organisation of the person who solicited the test which identified the causative agent.

(3) The notification must be provided in writing within 7 days beginning with the day on which the causative agent is identified.

(4) Without prejudice to paragraph (3), if the operator of the diagnostic laboratory considers that the case is urgent, the notification must be provided orally as soon as reasonably practicable.

(5) In determining whether the case is urgent, the operator of the diagnostic laboratory must have regard to —

(a)the nature of the causative agent;
(b)the nature of the disease which the causative agent causes;
(c)the ease of spread of the causative agent;
(d)the ways in which the spread of the causative agent can be prevented or controlled; and
(e)where known, P’s circumstances (including age, sex and occupation).

(6) This regulation does not apply where the operator of the diagnostic laboratory reasonably believes that the Health Protection Agency has already been notified in accordance with this regulation by the operator of another diagnostic laboratory in relation to the same causative agent being found in a sample from the same person.

(7) For the purposes of paragraph (1), a diagnostic laboratory identifies a causative agent where—

(a)the diagnostic laboratory identifies the causative agent; or

(b)the causative agent is identified by another laboratory under an arrangement made with that diagnostic laboratory.

(8) Where paragraph (7)(b) applies, the day on which the causative agent is identified for the purposes of paragraph (3), is the day on which the diagnostic laboratory became aware of the identification by the other laboratory.

(9) It is an offence for the operator of a diagnostic laboratory to fail without reasonable excuse to comply with this regulation.👈👈👈

(10) Any person who commits an offence under this regulation is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale.👈👈👈

(11) In this regulation—

“causative agent” means—
(a)

a causative agent listed in Schedule 2, or
(b)
evidence of an infection caused by such an agent;

“diagnostic laboratory” means an institution (or facility within an institution) which is equipped with apparatus and reagents for the performance of diagnostic tests for human infections;

“director of a diagnostic laboratory” means—
(a)
the clinical microbiologist, consultant pathologist or other registered medical practitioner or other person in charge of a diagnostic laboratory, or
(b)
any other person working in the diagnostic laboratory to whom the function of making a notification under this regulation has been delegated by the person mentioned in paragraph (a); and

“operator of a diagnostic laboratory” means the corporate body that operates the diagnostic laboratory or, if there is no such body, the director of the diagnostic laboratory.
Duty to provide information to the Health Protection Agency

5.—(1) This regulation applies where a notification has been made by the operator of a diagnostic laboratory to the Health Protection Agency under regulation 4.

(2) The Health Protection Agency may request that the person (R) who solicited the laboratory test which identified the causative agent to which the notification relates, provide to it the information listed at regulation 4(2) insofar as that information was not included in the notification.

(3) R must provide the information requested under paragraph (2) insofar as it is known to R.

(4) The information must be provided in writing within 3 days beginning with the day on which the request is made.

(5) Without prejudice to paragraph (4), if the Health Protection Agency considers the case to be urgent and informs R of this fact when making the request, the information must be provided orally as soon as reasonably practicable.

(6) In determining whether the case is urgent, the Health Protection Agency must have regard to—

(a)the nature of the causative agent to which the notification relates;
(b)the nature of the disease which the causative agent causes;
(c)the ease of spread of the causative agent;
(d)the ways in which the spread of the causative agent can be prevented or controlled; and
(e)where known, the circumstances of the person from whom the sample was taken (including age, sex and occupation).

43

Person dying in hospital with notifiable disease

(1)If—

(a)a person dies in hospital while suffering from a notifiable disease, and

(b)the proper officer of the local authority for the district or a registered medical practitioner certifies that in his opinion it is desirable, in order to prevent the spread of infection, that the body should not be removed from the hospital except for the purpose of being taken direct to a mortuary or being forthwith buried or cremated,

it shall not be lawful for any person to remove the body from the hospital except for such a purpose.

(2)In any such case, when the body is removed for the purpose of burial or cremation from the hospital or any mortuary to which it has been taken, it shall forthwith be taken direct to some place of burial or crematorium and there buried or cremated.

(3)A person who contravenes any provision of this section shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 1 on the standard scale.👈👈👈

44
Isolation of body of person dying with notifiable disease

Every person having the charge or control of premises in which is lying the body of a person who has died while suffering from a notifiable disease shall take such steps as may be reasonably practicable to prevent persons coming unnecessarily into contact with, or proximity to, the body, and if he fails to do so he shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 1 on the standard scale.👈👈

see link above for original document

#WakeUp
😈💩👎