Yonaguni = "Fake Archaeology"?... and perhaps 'Geology' is fake too!? HE...

I put it to the audience that if geologists did more chemistry (a LOT of them have chemistry background), they would see things differently. What's the correct method of continental formation? We suggest chemical crystallisation! For example, the Himalaya have been used as an argument against expanding earth. But how about a dynamic earth which shrinks as well? How about Crystalline Continents? How about Continental shelfs being CRYSTALLINE EDGES, and not formed by pressure or folding or volcanism as current geology suggests? Continents formed SPONTANEOUSLY via crystallisation when a solution containing liquid rock hits a pressure differential (the surface!) How about the Earth containing a catastrophically unstable BROWN DWARF?!  Sure there might be some folding at the continental shelves, but why confuse this with FORMATION? In fact crystals had no choice but to pop out of solution as soon as they hit the atmosphere layer! BASIC Chemistry but geologists are not always chemists!, I put it to the audience that if geologists did more chemistry (a LOT of them have chemistry background), they would see things differently. What's the correct method of continental formation? We suggest chemical crystallisation! For example, the Himalaya have been used as an argument against expanding earth. But how about a dynamic earth which shrinks as well? How about Crystalline Continents? How about Continental shelfs being CRYSTALLINE EDGES, and not formed by pressure or folding or volcanism as current geology suggests? Continents formed SPONTANEOUSLY via crystallisation when a solution containing liquid rock hits a pressure differential (the surface!) How about the Earth containing a catastrophically unstable BROWN DWARF?! Sure there might be some folding at the continental shelves, but why confuse this with FORMATION? In fact crystals had no choice but to pop out of solution as soon as they hit the atmosphere layer! BASIC Chemistry but geologists are not always chemists! the data suggests, that the rate of geological expansion of earth, is intrinsically linked with the expansion rate of the universe, IE the contraction phase and expansion phase or inhaled state and exhaled, has a direct effect on the mass within it, which ever you prefer, it's stands to reason if the universe is expanding outwards, any matter in it would expand also, like a picture on the outside of a inflatable balloon, the more air you put in, the more it creates the expansion and stretching, of the image on the outside of the balloon, "the crust", perhaps it's possible to accuracy date reality, and or find the initial size of the universe, (just after the cycle started again), by taking the expansion rate of the universe, and winding back the earth to it's minimal size, when we had the giant super continent and just the one sea, then i guess you have to figure out just how long, it would take for all the continents to drift, from there to their current position's, then times by the speed of light3 (cubed), you know, i bet it has something to do with Phi, it always is it's like a sneaky math commando, just lurking in the periphery, but i digress, it's now 15:46 I've been awake far too long, (2 days and i need coffee), but i'm pretty sure it should be something like this,  V = ⁴⁄₃πr³  radius +46 billion divided by 13.8 billion= 3333333333.33  Cube the radius  3.7037037e28,.Multiply the cubed radius by 4/3.=  4.9382716e+28, times by Phi  = 1.5514038e+29 volume of a sphere, (the universe,) after 1 year,  divide by  31556926  seconds = 4.916207e+21,  size of the universe 1 second after the big bang, so thats  4.916207e+21 times by (speed of light) 299792458  =4.916207e+21 * 299 792 458 (metres / second) = 1.47384178 × 1030 m / s   and i think i'll leave this for later, as a to be continued,,,,,, as i don't want to make a mistake, or sound like a nut from sleep deprivation, (i possibly did, but not necessarily) loolz  ;) #peace