I VIDEO TAROCCHI ED IL CAMION BASKO CHE PERCORRE 250 METRI IN UN SECONDO

Breaking down the Morandi bridge - Did Basko's truck fly 250 meters in a second? The investigative authorities take us for idiots and propose another package signed Procura di Genova.

The Genoa Judicial Police shows us a new film about the collapse of the Morandi bridge and in this case the authorities definitively get lost. In the video footage released on August 16, 2018, the Basko truck appears on the edge of the span, but in the same seconds of the September 26 footage the Basko truck still runs the bend, at least 250 meters before the precipice! How is it possible?

For clarity I report the statements of the Chief Prosecutor of the Procuration of Genoa Francesco Cozzi.

"There were problems with the video recordings of the Autostrade company. I can not say that there are materials of great importance or utility. Bad weather affected the bad quality of the images. The lack of real images or the interruption of images is due, to what is given to understand, to disconnections on the network due to the seismic phenomenon, to the collapse in short. In short, a blackout ": the Genoa prosecutor Francesco Cozzi said in an interview with Gr1 Rai referring to the recordings of the Autostrade company's cameras positioned on the Morandi bridge.

http: //www.meteoweb.eu/2018/08/crollo ...

The blackout of the Autostrade cameras, which did not resume the moment of the collapse of the Morandi bridge, was not caused by tampering. This is what emerges from the investigations of the mobile team in Genoa that solved the yellow on the interrupted video.

On the morning of August 14th, the power unit that powered the two cameras had had problems several times. The lifesaver had come off due to drops of tension but it was then broken down. Around 11.30, a few minutes before the collapse of the structure, a 'cloud' of rain also fell on the control unit and the water load was so high that the control unit was not able to start.

The second camera, which was resuming the junction, turned to the bridge only when the camera technician saw cars braking and vehicles that reversed the march, coming back in the wrong direction. But when the device pointed the structure, the collapse had already happened. The experts also excluded the lightning hypothesis that would have struck one of the bridge's stralli, causing it to break: the Arpal technicians have completed the mapping of the fallen lightning bolts that day and have found that the closest one has fallen down distance of over a kilometre.