Cellphone Radiation Hazard Information & Hazard Reduction, exposure levels & measurement methods
😈💩👎
This article discusses consumer concerns about cell-phone radiation or electromagnetic field (EMF) or electromagnetic radiation EMR and related terms such as EMF, radio frequency - RF, hertz or cycles, megahertz, medium frequency MF, very high frequency VHF, ultra high frequency UHF, megahertz MHz, gigahertz GHz, terahertz THz .
We include cell phone radiation exposure standards and suggestions from various sources on how to reduce cell phone radiation exposure
Cellphone Radiation Information & Reducing Cellphone EMR Exposure
photo of a cell phone signal tower whose appearance was improved to resemble a steel tree was taken along the New Jersey Turnpike.
Scientific research on possible health hazards from cell phone use to date (2010 )
(which if you haven't noticed is 10 years out of date and we have different technology available now such as 5G that we didn't have at the time of the research being conducted and then published, and so therefore logically it was not used or included in the guidelines that were set out for use internationally at the time of the publication or used in the testing or research studies used to create the "current" but still outdated guidelines that were set up to monitor and protect us all from (3G microwave radiation), and the adverse ill health effects caused from mobile phone and microwave radiation, which is whole body low level ionising radiation (see link 1-8) since the time of the publication (2010) has been thoroughly examined and has been conclusively proved to cause many "negative", "adverse" and "extreme" and in some cases even "terminal" health effects on human beings and animals and the environment and further increased levels from subsequent iterations of next generation technology that is way above 2010 power and specification levels all the way to the 5g terahertz range and beyond i'll add the links to that data directly below here DL)
(link 1 Comments on: NTP TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE TOXICOLOGY AND CARCINOGENESIS STUDIES IN Hsd:SPRAGUE DAWLEY SD RATS EXPOSED TO WHOLE-BODY RADIO FREQUENCY RADIATION AT A FREQUENCY (900 MHz) AND MODULATIONS (GSM AND CDMA) USED BY CELL PHONES NTP TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE TOXICOLOGY AND CARCINOGENESIS STUDIES IN B6C3F1/N MICE EXPOSED TO WHOLE-BODY RADIO FREQUENCY RADIATION AT A FREQUENCY (1,900 MHz) AND MODULATIONS (GSM AND CDMA) USED BY CELL PHONES PDF: Report of Partial Findings from the National Toxicology Program Carcinogenesis Studies of Cell Phone Radio frequency Radiation in Hsd: Sprague Dawley® SD rats (Whole Body Exposures)
LINK 2 PDF Report of Partial Findings from the National Toxicology Program Carcinogenesis Studies of Cell Phone Radio frequency Radiation in Hsd: Sprague Dawley® SD rats (Whole Body Exposures)
LINK 3 PDF TOXICOLOGY AND CARCINOGENESIS STUDIES IN Hsd:SPRAGUE DAWLEY SD RATS EXPOSED TO WHOLE-BODY RADIO FREQUENCY RADIATION AT A FREQUENCY (900 MHz) AND MODULATIONS (GSM AND CDMA) USED BY CELL PHONES
LINK 4 Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission
LINK 5 Scientific research concluding that radiation from cell phones, wireless phones(DECT), wireless internet(WiFi) or mobile phone masts poses a health risk
https://ediovision.blogspot.com/2018/10/scientific-research-concluding-that.html
LINK 6 The interaction between electromagnetic fields at megahertz, gigahertz and terahertz frequencies with cells, tissues and organisms: risks and potential
LINK 7 standing wave and wave propagation and the DNA effects
LINK 8 Cellular-Telephone Use and Brain Tumors 😈💩👎
"Scientific research on possible health hazards from cell phone use to date (2010 )" has produced conflicting results varying by study,
(and by just who is funding it, and just how badly the person writing it wishes to remain in their jobs. so let's just have a laugh at the utter lies and corporate propaganda line being pushed by the NYT as we know conclusively that there is much scientific factual evidence to irrefutably validate the claim and prove without a shadow of a doubt, that it is not just hearsay or speculation or the ramblings of many a "conspiracy theorists", but cold hard facts that wireless phones and the carrier network signals are dangerous because of the RF and microwave radiation they emit and receive is way above maximum safety threshold, So get ready for some clear;y and blatant lies from the new york times DL)
According to an article in June 2010 the New York Times,
Both the National Cancer Institute (who push fake cancer "treatments"on people but can't seem to find a cure, despite there being many Hmm ?!? DL) and the F.C.C. [Federal Communications Commission] (who make us all ill with radiation poisoning to create healthcare profits from the "harmacuiticle" industry and from the government clause of the seizure of property and estates from the elderly with no relatives or will, who succumb to the weakened immune systems that is triggered by targeted vectors in the Flu jab "vaccines" and activated by 5G microwave target specific radiation DL) say that there is no scientific evidence that wireless phones are dangerous, but each agency continues to monitor continuing medical studies.
(utter BS and lies read links above DL)
(both of those institutes are clearly lying through their teeth and working together in a criminal conspiracy to subvert the law and cause harm and injury to the taxpayers, as we all know treating cancer is a big cash cow. the CEO's of said corporations should be imprisoned and the corporate structure requires shutting down and dismantling and selling off piece by piece to pay reparations and damages to the people who have suffered at their murderous hands, as they provide zero positive information or do anything that can be deemed as worthwhile for the people, they scam people out of donations and the taxpayer through funding grants DL)
A widely cited January 2006 Swedish study (Kjell Mild) of both cordless home telephone use and cell phone use by children and teenagers found that that population were more likely to suffer brain cancer if they used mobile telephones.
(children's brains are more susceptible as the BBB (blood brain barrier) has not had enough time to grow to a sufficient thickness as to prevent the crossing of said barrier DL)
The U.S. FDA has questioned the reliability of the study, including pointing out that the study had not reported on the mechanism of action that caused the brain cancers cited.
Professor Lennart Hardell (University Hospital, Orebro, Sweden) who led the study reported at a September 2008 conference hosted at the Royal Society by the Radiation Research Trust "people who started mobile phone use before the age of 20" had more than five-fold increase in glioma", a cancer of the glial cells that support the central nervous system.
(Hmm coincidently On September 21, 1983, Motorola made history when the FCC approved the 8000X, the world's first commercial portable cell phone. and it's funny how the cancer rates begin to climb at that point in time when mobile phones began to become more widespread in public use, DL)
The extra risk to young people of contracting the disease from using the cordless phone found in many homes was almost as great, at more than four times higher.
So can using a cell phone increase the risk of brain tumors or not? (Well Derrrrr obviously DL)
The answer is a definitely
Attempts to sort through the confusion of multiple studies of possible cancer risks associated with cell phones have been made with some success. See "Mobile Phone Use and Risk of Tumors: A Meta-Analysis", Seung-Kwon Myung et als, 2009. This meta study of 465 articles from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (Aug. 2008) concluded that
The current study found that there is "possible evidence" linking mobile phone use to an increased risk of tumors from a meta-analysis of low-biased case-control studies. Prospective cohort studies providing a higher level of evidence are needed. (we already have them DL)
The cell phone tower in our photo is located in Westchester County, New York. Exposure of electromagnetic radiation from cell towers is normally a separate question from EMR exposure from use of cellphones themselves.
Definition of cellphone radiation - cellular telephones, because they include a radio transmitter, emit electromagnetic fields (EMF, or EMR).
In the United States the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) specifies the allowable limits of cell phone radiation. If ultimately cell phone radiation is shown to be a health risk to some users, a possible concern is the exposure of the human ear and brain to cellphone radiation, especially as newer digital cell phones operate at higher power and at frequencies in the 1800-2000 MHz range.
Presently some cell phones may exceed the FCC EMR or SAR (defined below) limit that was set when most cell phones were analog in signal design and emitted lower-strength EMFs in the 800-900 MHz range.(2010)
Definition of SAR & SAR Limits - Specific Absorption Rate of Radiation - measures the amount of radiation that a human body absorbs from a source such as from a nearby radio transmitting antenna or cellphone
(radio receiving antennas do not emit EMF).
What type of radiation is emitted by a cellphone?
Older cell phones emit and receive low level radio frequency waves from 200 MHz to more than 800 MHz. Newer cell phones operate in the wider 900 MHz to 2.4 GHz or more (approaching the power and frequency of microwaves and infrared waves). (like a slow cooker DL)
How much radiation is emitted by a cellphone?
The answer depends on the cell phone technology (cell phone model, analog versus digital signal), the cell phone transmitter strength (newer phones may be more powerful), and other factors. Cell phone radiation, measured in watts per kilogram of body tissue, ranges from 0.2 watts/Kg to 1.6 watts/Kg.
