https://patents.google.com/patent/US8757552B1/en?oq=4402480
Abstract
A dozen or more orbiting solar generators stay in constant touch. They can be congregated rapidly in space at any desired secret location. Once congregated they all focus their energy to a death star. This death star is a newly launched ICBM with a microwave or laser collector. A laser generator uses this huge energy to project a non-nuclear death ray to a target. The target could be a city, a ship or a satellite. In the event of an asteroid approaching earth, this system could destroy an asteroid. In peacetime the orbiting solar generators supply electric power to an earth based power grid.
Images (7)
Classifications
B64G1/10 Artificial satellites; Systems of such satellites; Interplanetary vehicles
View 7 more classifications
US8757552B1
US Grant
Download PDF Find Prior Art Similar
Inventor Rick Martin Original Assignee Rick Martin Priority date 2013-02-27
Family: US (4)
Date
App/Pub Number
Status
2013-06-20
US13922648
Active
2014-06-24
US8757552B1
Grant
2014
US14283536
Active
2015
US14620471
Active
2015
US14636396
Active
Info Patent citations (6) Non-patent citations (4) Cited by (2) Legal events Similar documents Priority and Related Applications External links USPTOUSPTO AssignmentEspacenetGlobal DossierDiscuss
Description
CROSS REFERENCE
This is a non-provisional application deriving priority from U.S. Patent Application 61/770,155 filed Feb. 27, 2013.
FIELD OF INVENTION
The present invention relates to providing a non-nuclear weapon of mass destruction, wherein a plurality of orbiting solar power generators (microwave and/or laser) coordinate their energy to a newly launched death star that focuses this coordinated laser energy to a target.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Death star super weapons have been designed but not implemented. One key reason is the vulnerability of a giant orbiting weapon from ICBM's and/or killer satellites and/or space based nuclear explosions.
The present invention eliminates that vulnerability. Many dozen small orbiting solar generators (cells) are launched so that each cell continuously generates solar energy as exemplified in the international space station. Each cell communicates not only with earth control stations, but with each other. Each cell has an onboard processor that continuously calculates how the group of cells could quickly organize into a small area and focus their energy to one death star.
This death star can be launched at a moment's notice from earth. It is not a sitting duck. Ideally a group of death stars would continually move about the earth on tracks, ships, airplanes or in orbit.
When an attack is ordered at least one death star is launched to the rendezvous point of a group of cells. The death star obtains an orbit and fixes the target(s) in its guidance system.
The death star can have a burst power laser powered by the accumulation of dozens of cells. Or it may be a reverse telescope that focuses multiple laser rays from cells and concentrates a super laser beam to the target.
An enemy would have to obtain and destroy virtually all of the cells to knock the weapon out. Or the enemy would have to obtain and destroy multiple death star ICBM's coming from anywhere on earth.
Even this knock out scenario is not a fatal blow to the system. Since one cell can power a city of 80,000, a dozen cells could power a city of a million people. This system could focus a dozen (or more) cells at a target, such as a city, and produce the equivalent of Sherman's march through Georgia, all in a non-nuclear manner using microwave energy. All this destructive force can be done without the death star at all.
In the ideal scenario the cells would initially function as an orbiting solar generator for a city. A beam of microwave energy, perhaps five miles wide, is generated by a geostationary orbiting solar generator. PG&E is producing one system now.
THE SOLAR POWER CELL
Solar from Space
By Anne L. Fischer
The sun shines 24/7 in outer space, so it is not surprising that solar power seekers worldwide are setting up shop out there—or at least taking steps in that direction.
Solar power drawn from space-based satellites is not a new concept. It was prevent in the Journal Science in 1968 and patented by Dr. Peter E. Glaser in 1973. During the energy crisis of the 1970's the US Department of Energy studied space-based power, proving that, although technically feasible, it was economically impractical and less efficient than other forms of energy.
In the 1990's, NASA revived the concept with the “Fresh Look” study and, by 2007, with a revived focus on renewable energy sources, many groups—both government and industry—had stepped up the studies and the investment. Over the course of three decades, the US government and NASA have collectively invested about $80 million in the study of space—based solar.
The most common approach to space—based solar power generation would place satellites into geostationary orbit—a 24-hour revolution synchronized with the Earth's rotation—at an altitude of 22,500 miles. The satellite would be equipped with photovoltaic solar panels that would collect sunlight and, using solid-state power amplifiers, would convert the solar power to 2.45 or 5.8 GHz microwaves that would be beamed to a receiver on Earth. The receiver, called a rectenna, would convert microwave energy into electricity, which would be sent to a local power grid.
John C. Mankins, who formerly managed NASA's space solar power studies and who now owns Managed Energy Technologies of Ashburn, Va., said that this is no small undertaking. Speaking with Jeff Young on National public Radio's “Living on Earth” program, he said that the transmitter would measure about a half mile across, or the equivalent of approximately 20 international space stations. The beam would be about a half mile wide in space and would spread to about four miles wide when received on Earth.
“You'd certainly want to take the right precautions, keep the energy density, the amount of power that's in a square meter of the beam low enough to be safe,” he told Young.
Not without Challenges
As with the development of all forms of solar power, a huge challenge is the generation power cheaply, reliably and safely. Generating it in space adds variables, including finding materials that can withstand high temperatures, placing huge satellite transmitters into space and placing receivers on Earth, and ensuring that the beams sent to Earth are not harmful to humans or to the environment.
Research and development costs aside, the biggest ticket item is expected to be the cost of launching the satellites. Space Energy AG of Switzerland has made great strides toward developing its solar from space concept, and its business plan allocates about $125 million just to hoist its satellite into space.
The beam of microwave energy would measure a mile or two across and would pass through the atmosphere easily. Some energy would be lost, although exactly how much is not yet know, and skeptics could raise disaster ridden questions: What if the beam strays? Could birds or humans be harmed? Would the beam affect weather or cause other changes to the environment?
Dr. James Logan, former chief of medical operations at NASA's Johnson Space Center, has studied these issues and has answers to many of the questions: If the beam strayed, for example, it could be defocused. If birds passed through the beam, they would feel some warmth, but microwave radiation is nonionizing and cannot make a charged particle that would damage DNA or biomolecules.
Signing Up
Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (PG&E) of San Francisco recently signed a supply agreement with Solaren Corp. of Manhattan Beach, Calf., for 200 MW of electricity generated in space and transmitted by microwave beam to a receiving station in Fresno County, Calif. The contract calls for the power to begin to flow in 2016.
In an interview posted on PG&E's Next 100 Web site, Solaren CEO Gary Spimak said he is confident that, by using proven technology and designs, and through extensive testing, the company will be able to deliver on the contract.
Others also are working at commercializing space based solar power. Space Energy is developing solar satellites, and the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) plans to have a 1-GW satellite in orbit by 2030 but has not decided whether it will beam microwave or laser beams back to Earth. In conjunction with Mitsubishi Electric and Electronic USA of Cypress, Calif., it is working on the concept of a space solar power system composed of multiple satellites orbiting in formation.
Another group, sponsored by The Discovery Channel, conducted land—based tests last year, sending a microwave beam from solar collectors on a mountaintop in Maui, Hi. The beam was transmitted about 90 miles, or the equivalent of the distance it would have to penetrate from space. The transmission was successful but sent only about 20 W with a limited setup.
Turning Talk into Action
No one country owns space, so it makes sense to work on an International level to resolve many of the hurdles. A global dialogue has been taking place in many forms. For example, in September, the International Symposium on Space—Based Solar Energy will take place in Toronto, sponsored by SPACE Canada in cooperation with the International Academy of Astronautics. A lot of the talk will be focused on perhaps the greatest hurdles for space—based solar: regulatory and licensing issues around frequency allocations, orbital slots and liability. Nonetheless, with promises such as that made by Solaren, space—based solar may be moving into the sphere of reality.
Solar-Powered Space Station
The International Space Station is a great example of solar power at work. The largest spacecraft ever in orbit, it has a wingspan of approximately 361 ft. and a length of 262 ft. It weights 1 million pounds and orbits at an altitude of approximately 220 nautical miles. Six astronauts currently are conducting experiments in its six laboratories.
The space station is powered by four power modules with two solar arrays on each. The eight arrays produce around 120 kW of usable electricity—enough to run about 42 average size homes. The arrays play a critical role, supplying power to such things as the systems that provide or control the air the astronauts breathe, food storage and temperature controls.
Each wing uses 32,800 solar cells manufactured by Spectrolab Inc. of Sylmar, Calif., a Boeing Corp. company. The fourth set of solar arrays was attached in March by two space walking astronauts, with the assistance of a robotic arm that held the $300 million, 14-ton power module. With the power supplied by the fourth wing, the space station now provides living quarters of six astronauts, double the number prior to the new installation. The astronauts also have enough power for life support and for taking on additional scientific studies.
Designed in the 1990s, the solar cells are silicon-based. Spectrolab President David Lillington describes the cells as being the largest produced at the time, measuring just over 60 cm2. He said that the cells can turn about 14.5 percent of the solar spectrum into electricity. Uniquely designed, the front contacts to the solar cells wrap through to the back side via small holes drilled through the cells.
The space station provides an ideal environment of evaluation of new solar cell technologies and materials through NASA's Materials International Space Station Experiment test bed. In addition, much can be learned about the effects of atomic oxygen, Lillington said.
Solar cells in space are not without their tormentors. Space debris can take them out quickly. Carter Reznick, a Boeing engineer, said that, because working on or replacing the cells is not a simple process, the station is equipped with far more of them than necessary. A cell's power drops off over time, but constant monitoring via sensors has shown that all 82 circuits are working and that there has been no measurable drop thus far. END.
Thus, America could maintain perhaps one solar generator per state. The costs would in part be paid by the space based electrical energy.
For wartime use these cells could be scattered all over various orbits. Then the death star(s) completes a rendezvous. The totality of the microwaves from just ten cells could power a city of one million.
The death star laser generator focuses this energy into a beam. Directing this beam over targets such as cities, military bases or ships would define a weapon of mass destruction, without nuclear blowback.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The main aspect of the present invention is to disperse an enormous orbiting power generator array of cells such that it is not possible to obtain and destroy all the power generating cells.
Another aspect of the present invention is to continuously communicate location data among the cells so that a rapid rendezvous of multiple cells could be setup anywhere over the earth.
Another aspect of the present invention is to produce an ICBM energy collector such as a microwave or laser concentrator. This ICBM is called a death star.
Another aspect of the present invention is to continuously move a plurality of death stars all around the earth ready to launch.
Another aspect of the present invention is to coordinate the launch of a death star and the rendezvous of several power generating cells rapidly.
Another aspect of the present invention is to combine the discharging of multiple cells into the death star and create a non-nuclear weapon of mass destruction.
Another aspect of the present invention is to direct several cells' microwave energy onto a target, thus, the heat can be turned up gradually.
Another aspect of the present invention is to utilize the cells as orbiting electrical generators in peacetime.
Other aspects of this invention will appear from the following description and appended claims, reference being made to the accompanying drawings forming a part of this specification wherein like reference characters designate corresponding parts in the several views.
LGM-118A Peacekeeper—a Potential ICBM Launch Vehicle
The post-boost vehicle system is made up of a maneuvering rocket, and a guidance and control system. The vehicle rides atop the boost system, weighs about 3,000 pounds (1,363 kilograms) and is 4 feet (1.21 meters) long.
Aboard the ICBM could be a super capacitor made, for example, from a Graphene—cu compound structure. See Harvesting and Storing Laser Irradiation Energy With Graphene—cu Compound Structure, Wenbin Gong, Cornell University Library, arXIV.org>physics>arXIV:1207.3131, 13 Jul. 2012 revised 15 Aug. 2012.
Graphene-metal compound structure has been reported as a novel and outstanding component used in electrical and optical devices. Publicly known is a first-principles study of graphene-cu compound structure, showing its capacity of converting laser energy into electrical power and storing the harvested energy for a long time. A real-time and real-space time-dependent density functional method (TDDFT) is applied for the simulation of electrons dynamics and energy absorption. The laser-induced charge transfer from copper layer to graphene layer is observed and represented by plane-averaged electron difference and dipoles. The effects of laser frequency on the excitation energy and charge transfer are studied as well. The enhancement of C-C σ-bond and decreasing of electron density corresponding to μ-bond within graphene layer are responsible for the ability of storing the harvested energy for a long time.
At present, graphene is considered to be an excellent candidate for development of carbon-based electronics and optoelectronics, thanks to-its properties, such as very high electron mobility, high current-carrying density and excellent heat dissipation. Recent progress in converting solar and mechanical energy into electric power by using carbon based materials has opened a door for a brand-new way of energy harvesting with high conversion efficiency. Up to ten times the storage to weight efficiency now known can potentially be achieved. In addition carbon-based supercapacitor shows its outstanding property of high values of capacitance and energy density which indicates the possibility of storing electrical charges efficiently. Of particular interest is the fact that graphene-based materials have demonstrated controllable surface and interface properties as well as tailored work functions via fictionalization during synthesis and/or post-treatment. Since the graphene can be n-type or p-type doped through contacting with different metals, it inspires fascination applications of harvesting irradiation energies such as laser. Previous works have studied the electronic transport through metal-graphene junction and the global photo-response in epitaxial graphene with metal contact, it is advantageous to explore the full picture of the electronic dynamic of the contacts at the nanometer scale with the existence of a laser.
It is found that electron transfer from copper layer to graphene sheet occurs when the compound structure is under the laser irradiation. Due to the electronic oscillation of graphene sheet, the external applied lasers with different frequency result in different electron transfers. The in plane σ-bond of graphene enhances after the laser irradiation while μ-bond decreases its electronic density. We infer this is responsible for the long-time life storage of the harvested energy based on this compound structure. A plane capacitor model could be used to describe this structure, then harvesting and storing laser irradiation energy is the procedure of charging the capacitor.
Presently public analysis suggests the use of a plane capacitor model to describe the compound structure under the irradiation of laser pulses; the induced charge distribution is then modeled as two sheets of charge. Harvesting and storing laser irradiation energy is the procedure of charging the capacitor.
The simulations of electron dynamics under irradiation of laser pulses are performed by using TDDFT method. The graphene-Cu compound structure is found to be an appropriate material to harvest laser energy and convert the absorbed energy into electric power. The mechanism of conversion is investigated in our study and the effects of laser frequency as well. It is found that by subjecting the compound structure to external alternation electric fields parallel to the layers, charge transfer occurs from the copper layer to graphene sheet. At the same pulse energy, the laser with longer wavelength induces more charge transfer. The enhancement of in-plane σ-bond in graphene should be the key point to store the harvested energy for quite a long time. The basic information on graphene-cu compound structure obtained in this work is useful for developing novel energy harvesting and storing other super capacitor modules might use barium titanate which can hold ten to one hundreds times the energy of to the capacitors. Estimates of energy storage known today are 44 MJ/m cubed. The potential output powers are very high for a short time. Then the super capacitor can be re-charged by the cells.
The Laser Weapon
The laser weapon on board the ICBM and its super capacitor energy source could be a weapons grade laser. This technology is publicly available as a ship board laser weapon. See news.yahoo.com/navys-laser-weapon-blasts-bad-215808231.html,©2013.
Early next year the Navy will place a laser weapon aboard a ship in the Persian Gulf where it could be used to fend off approaching unmanned aerial vehicles of speedboats.
The Navy calls its futuristic weapon LAWS, which stands for the Laser Weapon Systems. What looks like a small telescope is actually a weapon that can track a moving target and fire a steady laser beam strong enough to burn a hole through steel.
A Navy video of testing conducted last summer off the coast of California shows how a laser beam fired from a Navy destroyer was able to set aflame an approaching UAV or drone, sending it crashing into the ocean.
“There was not a single miss” during the testing, said Rear Admiral Matthew Klunder, chief of Naval Research. The laser was three for tree in bringing sown an approaching unmanned aerial vehicle and 12 for 12 when previous testes are factored in.
Navy officials have provided a few unclassified details. For example, the laser is designed to be a “plug and play” system that integrates into a ship's existing targeting technologies and power grids. Those factors make it a surprisingly cheap weapon.
Klunder says each pulse of energy from the laser “costs under a dollar” and it can be used against weapon systems that are significantly more expensive.
Rear Admiral Thomas Eccles, Navy Sea Systems Commander, says the beam can be turned on instantly and the ultimately “the generation of power is essentially your magazine. It's the clip we have” instead of bullets. “We deliver precision with essentially an endless supply of rounds.”
The strength of the beam is flexible enough that at a lower intensity level it can be used to warn approaching ships and UAV's not to get too close to a Navy ship. Instead of using machine guns to fire non-lethal warning shots as navy ships do now, the laser can be aimed to “dazzle” the viewing sensors aboard the craft. That light effect warns the pilot of a small water craft or UAV that they are being targeted by a laser and to turn away. If they don't, the laser's power can be boosted to destroy the approaching craft.
Based on earlier testing the Navy is confident the laser is ready for real-world testing aboard the USS Ponce in the Persian Gulf. The ship was selected because of its mission to be an enduring presence in the Gulf to counter Iranian maritime threats in the region.
The laser could be a hundreds of megawatts per square centimeter. It could be a red helium neon laser. It could be pulsed so as to provide a deep penetrating using a Gaussian beam. This type of beam could generate high heat below the surface of a target. This high heat could cause an explosion beneath the surface of the target, thus, gaining a maximum destructive force from the space based laser beam.
In summary each orbiting solar cell could aim its laser beam at the ICBM super capacitor. The death star could fire at its target. The cluster of solar cells could replenish the super capacitor. The entire system could be re-located if an attacking missile(s) were detected.
