The Lost History Channel TKTC
We do wonder how plausible it is to consider that Human understanding and thinking are 2 different things, we believe we can reach bigger heights than we actually can, before inevitability ruling it out, but if we are in fact envisioning things that existed thousands or millions of years ago and the Human conscious witnessed such things, then could we in fact be recovering such memories from that time in the today and now? Just a thought guys, but one we should deeply ponder,
and currently they're also pitching it as a giant sun shade which is a lie, on the other side they are planning to put a huge mirror to make this weapon system :) #peace
this is how they get you to pay for the weapons to kill you wake the fuck up peeps, do not believe their lies they do not care about you, in all truth they hate you & me and everyone else that isn't them, they believe we are vermin to be exterminated and cattle to be slain and profited by so fuck them!, they are the criminal, they are the ones who falsely imprison, punish and kill you and your families dont you get it yet we dont need them at all we never did we can al be free from them and their heinous crimes? #WakeTheFuckUpWorld #TheTruthIsKnockingAtYourDoor!
the following is a N.W.O pitch in the form of them caring about the environment and you which is contrary to every other single action that they have ever done as a system of control
Scientists suggest a giant sunshade in the sky could solve global warming

Solar geoengineering has been floated as an ‘outlandish and unsettling’ answer to climate change. Photograph: ISS/Nasa
It sounds like the stuff of science fiction: the creation, using balloons or jets, of a manmade atmospheric sunshade to shield the most vulnerable countries in the global south against the worst effects of global warming.
But amid mounting interest in “solar geoengineering” – not least among western universities – a group of scientists from developing countries has issued a forceful call to have a greater say in the direction of research into climate change, arguing that their countries are the ones with most at stake.
Scientists have long known that man made events like pollution in the atmosphere, smoke from forest fires and volcanic eruptions can create a cooling effect.

That has led scientists at Harvard University to propose their own experiment, which they call “stratospheric controlled perturbation effect”, or SCoPEx for short. It involves using a balloon to test the controversial proposition that aerosols released at a height of 20km in the Earth’s atmosphere can alter the reflective properties of cloud cover.
(biological attack)
Now a dozen scholars, from countries including Bangladesh, Brazil, China, Ethiopia, India, Jamaica and Thailand, have joined the debate, arguing in the journal Nature that poor countries should take a lead in the field since they have most to gain or lose from the technology.
(even though there are hundreds of thousands that say they don't want it and want it to stop, but yeah sure lets listen to 12 random strangers opinions that in no way are any better than anyone else's, that probably also don't even exist except on paper)
The cooling effect has long been known in phenomena such as “ship tracks” – narrow artificial clouds of pollution, created by emissions from ships, that contain more and smaller water droplets than typical clouds, making them brighter and more reflective of sunlight.
“Solar geoengineering – injecting aerosol particles into the stratosphere to reflect away a little inbound sunlight – is being discussed as a way to cool the planet, fast,” the scientists write in Nature.
“Solar geoengineering is outlandish and unsettling. It invokes technologies that are redolent of science fiction – jets lacing the stratosphere with sunlight-blocking particles, and fleets of ships spraying seawater into low-lying clouds to make them whiter and brighter to reflect sunlight.
“Yet, if such approaches could be realised technically and politically, they could slow, stop or even reverse the rise in global temperatures within one or two years.
“The technique is controversial, and rightly so,” they add. “It is too early to know what its effects would be: it could be very helpful or very harmful. Developing countries have most to gain or lose. In our view, they must maintain their climate leadership and play a central part in research and discussions around solar geoengineering.”
It sounds like the stuff of science fiction: the creation, using balloons or jets, of a manmade atmospheric sunshade to shield the most vulnerable countries in the global south against the worst effects of global warming.
But amid mounting interest in “solar geoengineering” – not least among western universities – a group of scientists from developing countries has issued a forceful call to have a greater say in the direction of research into climate change, arguing that their countries are the ones with most at stake.
Scientists have long known that man made events like pollution in the atmosphere, smoke from forest fires and volcanic eruptions can create a cooling effect.

That has led scientists at Harvard University to propose their own experiment, which they call “stratospheric controlled perturbation effect”, or SCoPEx for short. It involves using a balloon to test the controversial proposition that aerosols released at a height of 20km in the Earth’s atmosphere can alter the reflective properties of cloud cover.
(biological attack)
Now a dozen scholars, from countries including Bangladesh, Brazil, China, Ethiopia, India, Jamaica and Thailand, have joined the debate, arguing in the journal Nature that poor countries should take a lead in the field since they have most to gain or lose from the technology.
(even though there are hundreds of thousands that say they don't want it and want it to stop, but yeah sure lets listen to 12 random strangers opinions that in no way are any better than anyone else's, that probably also don't even exist except on paper)
The cooling effect has long been known in phenomena such as “ship tracks” – narrow artificial clouds of pollution, created by emissions from ships, that contain more and smaller water droplets than typical clouds, making them brighter and more reflective of sunlight.
(you mean those ships owned and run by bill gates the ones you park off the coast of Africa see http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2010/05/10/bill-gates-funds-the-most-benign-form-of-geoengineering-ships-that-spray-seawater-to-seed-clouds/#.W8-tPWhKhPY)

“Solar geoengineering – injecting aerosol particles into the stratosphere to reflect away a little inbound sunlight – is being discussed as a way to cool the planet, fast,” the scientists write in Nature.
(but is ineffectual and is really a covert biological attack against the civilians of all nations of the planet)
“Solar geoengineering is outlandish and unsettling. It invokes technologies that are redolent of science fiction – jets lacing the stratosphere with sunlight-blocking particles, and fleets of ships spraying seawater into low-lying clouds to make them whiter and brighter to reflect sunlight.
“Yet, if such approaches could be realised technically and politically, they could slow, stop or even reverse the rise in global temperatures within one or two years.
“The technique is controversial, and rightly so,” they add. “It is too early to know what its effects would be: it could be very helpful or very harmful. Developing countries have most to gain or lose. In our view, they must maintain their climate leadership and play a central part in research and discussions around solar geoengineering.”
(its too early to know what the effects could be, yet they're still fucking doing it)
In an interview with Reuters, Dr Atiq Rahman, director of the Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies and the article’s lead author, amplified his arguments.
“Clearly [solar radiation management geoengineering] could be dangerous, but we need to know whether, for countries like Bangladesh, it would be more or less risky than passing the 1.5C warming goal. This matters greatly to people from developing countries and our voices need to be heard.
“The overall idea [of solar geoengineering] is pretty crazy, but it is gradually taking root in the world of research,” said Rahman.
(seriously i can fix it, but you have to believe me and trust in me, I've never lied to you, why would i, it would only be lying to myself)
The solar geoengineering studies may be helped by a new $400,000 (£284,100) research project, the solar radiation management governance initiative (SRMGI), which is issuing a first call for scientists to apply for finance this week.
In an interview with Reuters, Dr Atiq Rahman, director of the Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies and the article’s lead author, amplified his arguments.
“Clearly [solar radiation management geoengineering] could be dangerous, but we need to know whether, for countries like Bangladesh, it would be more or less risky than passing the 1.5C warming goal. This matters greatly to people from developing countries and our voices need to be heard.
“The overall idea [of solar geoengineering] is pretty crazy, but it is gradually taking root in the world of research,” said Rahman.
(seriously i can fix it, but you have to believe me and trust in me, I've never lied to you, why would i, it would only be lying to myself)
The solar geoengineering studies may be helped by a new $400,000 (£284,100) research project, the solar radiation management governance initiative (SRMGI), which is issuing a first call for scientists to apply for finance this week.
(really i smell bull shit, where they advertising this sort of stuff?, because i've certainly never heard them asking for anyone or offering grants or jobs to help fight against global warming, send it my way give me autonomy to shut down things that require it, and install things that need doing and as we say where i come from, jobs a good un)
The initiative is financed by the Open Philanthropy Project, a foundation backed by Dustin Moskovitz, a co-founder of Facebook, and his wife, Cari Tuna.
(and out of all the accounts they spy on, they didn't find anything that could help, pft i find that hard to believe given that my accounts are all public and I've been posting viable means for fixing the environment and free energy and such things for quite sometime)
The fund could help scientists in developing nations study the regional impacts of solar geoengineering, for instance on droughts, floods or monsoons, said Andy Parker, a co-author and project director of the SRMGI.
The initiative is financed by the Open Philanthropy Project, a foundation backed by Dustin Moskovitz, a co-founder of Facebook, and his wife, Cari Tuna.
(and out of all the accounts they spy on, they didn't find anything that could help, pft i find that hard to believe given that my accounts are all public and I've been posting viable means for fixing the environment and free energy and such things for quite sometime)
The fund could help scientists in developing nations study the regional impacts of solar geoengineering, for instance on droughts, floods or monsoons, said Andy Parker, a co-author and project director of the SRMGI.
(we already know the impacts, people die as a result simple A.F, we dont need to study it we need to stop it ffs)
Rahman said the academics were not taking sides about whether geoengineering would work.
And not everyone is convinced by the prospect of the technology.
In a leaked draft of a report about global warming due for publication in October, a UN panel of climate experts express scepticism about solar geoengineering, suggesting it may be “economically, socially and institutionally infeasible”.
Rahman said the academics were not taking sides about whether geoengineering would work.
And not everyone is convinced by the prospect of the technology.
In a leaked draft of a report about global warming due for publication in October, a UN panel of climate experts express scepticism about solar geoengineering, suggesting it may be “economically, socially and institutionally infeasible”.
but its not undo-able as i know i can do it, just give me a shot at it, whats the worst that could happen?, its not like i can make more pollution and fuck it up more than they already have done, my methods are sound, my theory is proven, the technology already exists its just not being used to its potential or responsibly at all so let me get on with it already :) #peace