https://ediovision.blogspot.com/2019/12/low-intensity-conflict-and-modern.html
😈💩👎
A United States Air force report from 1986 that discusses details of the military applications of EMF at different frequencies, amplitudes, pulsed waves, wave-forms etc. For anyone thinking the concerns over 5G are all "Conspiracy Woo", here's a few extracts.
"The results of many studies that have been published in the last few years indicate
that specific biological effects can be achieved by controlling the various parameters of the electromagnetic (EM) field. A few of the more important EMF factors that can be manipulated are frequency, wave shape, rate of pulse onset,
pulse duration, pulse amplitude, repetition rate, secondary modulation, and symmetry and asymmetry of the pulse.......
Effects-
- Electro-anaesthesia.
- Electro-convulsive therapy.
- Behaviour modification in animals.
- Altered electroencephalograms in animals and humans.
- Altered brain morphology in animals.
- Effects of acupuncture.
- Treatment of drug addiction.
- Electro-stimulation for relief of pain.
- Altered firing of neuronal cells.
These are but a few of the many biological effects and uses that have been reported
over the past decade. They are not exhaustive and do not include many of the effects
reported in the Soviet and East European literature.
Currently available data allow the projection that specially generated radio-frequency radiation
(RFR) fields may pose powerful and revolutionary antipersonnel military threats. Electroshock therapy indicates the ability of induced electric current to completely interrupt mental functioning for short periods of time, to obtain cognition for longer periods and to "Restructure emotional response over prolonged intervals" [NB: is this happening now? Is this possibly why ppl react so emotionally over small issues? If it was/wasn't happening......how would we know in environments polluted with EMF from so many sources?)
Experience with electroshock therapy. RFR experiments and the increasing understanding of the brain as an electrically mediated organ suggested the serious probability that impressed electromagnetic fields can be disruptive to purposeful behaviour and may be capable of directing and/or interrogating such behaviour.
Further, the passage of approximately 100 milliamperes through the myocardium can lead to cardiac standstill and death, again pointing to a speed-of-light weapons effect.
A rapidly scanning RFR system could provide an 'effective stun or kill capability' over a 'large area'.
System effectiveness will be a function of wave form, field intensity, pulse widths, repetition
frequency, and carrier frequency. The system can be developed using tissue and whole animal experimental studies, coupled with mechanisms and waveform effects research.
Using relatively low-level RFR, it may be possible to 'sensitise large military groups' to extremely
dispersed amounts of 'biological or chemical agents' [NB: like those in meds/vaccines?] to which the 'un-irradiated population would be immune'
[Nb: so, in theory, a load of political types could hang out in a newly 5G EMF proofed refurbished Parliament building ensuring their own immunity, whilst subjecting a population to a 'highly dispersed' biological//chemical agent which renders them sick? Perhaps the xeno-oestrogen in our environment are having a modulated/enhanced effect bcos of EMF levels, which in themselves also reduce testosterone production by 26% ....could this be a factor in the explosion of kids wanting to swap sex/gender? What with EMF capacity to, and I quote 'Restructure emotional responses' ie 'Feelings']
potential applications of artificial electromagnetic fields are wide ranging and
can be used in many military or quasi-military situations.
Some of these potential uses include dealing with terrorist groups, crowd control,
controlling breeches of security at military installations, and antipersonnel
techniques in tactical warfare. In all of these cases the EM systems would be used to
produce mild to severe physiological disruption or perceptual distortion or
disorientation. In addition the ability of individuals to function could be degraded to
such a point that they would be combat ineffective. Another advantage of
electromagnetic systems is that they can provide coverage over large areas with a
single system. They are silent and countermeasures to them may be difficult to
develop. Assuming that electromagnetic radiation can be controlled to produce a
specific adverse biological effect.
Recently, pulsed electromagnetic fields have been reported to induce cellular transcription. At the other end of the non-ionising spectrum, research reports are also showing biological effects that are not predicted by classical theories. For example, Kremer and others have published several papers showing that low-
intensity millimetre waves [NB: 5G] produce biological effects. They have also shown that
not only are the effects seen at 'Very low power' but they are also frequency specific.
Current research in chaotic behaviour has shown that the alternation of only one parameter to a critical phase can induce chaotic behaviour with drastic outcomes. It is not too difficult to envision that electromagnetic systems could interact with the electrical signal in cardiac muscle. If the proper parameters were utilised, several possible results could be produced. These include auricular or ventricular fibrillation, or complete asystole with a resultant fatal outcome.
Past research has shown both altered behaviour in animals and altered electroencephalograms (EEG) in both humans and animals. What these EEG changes mean in practical terms to humans at the present time is difficult to say,
since we still lack a great deal of knowledge and there is much controversy about what a "normal" EEG means. It is currently impossible to understand and to predict how an altered EEG can influence behaviour and the cognitive processes of an individual.
Some current research provides a few clues that altering brain waves can have a major impact on a person's cognitive and overt behaviour. In this regard, some people have even speculated that electromagnetism has already been used for
this purpose.
Some recent theoretical research has looked at the classical neuronal synapse and proposed that the size of the synaptic space is so small that rather than a pure chemical event taking place, it must be a quantum mechanical event.
These quantum mechanical events, being statistical in nature and depending upon
cross talk from other cells instead of a pure internal electrical conductance within the
single cell, infer that the complex system will be susceptible to external nonlinear electromagnetic influences. The disruption of neural pathways can lead to a multitude of effects.
With today's sophisticated weapon systems, one does not have to totally disable individuals to render them ineffective for combat. For example, if their timing is altered or their cognitive processes are degraded these individuals may be unable to operate their equipment (fly their aircraft, make the proper
decision with computer-operated systems, or successfully complete related action).
Because of the many parameters involved and the apparent specificity of each parameter, one can tailor a specific response.
The ability to have this kind of flexibility provides an enormous range of options to the user. It opens the door for providing an appropriate response in warfare, be it conventional or unconventional.
There are still many unanswered questions concerning this technology. To date, the
vast majority of research done in this country has focused on using single frequency
sources with standard parameters. No one has used multiple frequencies during a
single exposure, nor has anyone tried to manipulate the parameters to produce
biological effects. Up to the present time the majority of scientists in the United
States have assumed that a "microwave is a microwave," and research done at one
frequency would be applicable to any frequency in the same region. We now know
that the experiment must be frequency specific, but how specific?
Does this change for various portions of the electromagnetic spectrum?
There are unconfirmed reports that a change of .01 hertz can make a difference. Most scientists still do not believe that this small a change in frequency will make a difference. Yet, Rapp has
shown that a frequency-encoded signal can act as a trigger for the release of amylase
from the salivary glands of the blowfly (Calliphora exythocephalla). The variation
in the frequency that modified the release of the enzyme was from 0.00 hertz to 0.056 hertz. In this study the stimulus was the chemical 5-hydroxytryptaime.
What is of particular interest is that the original chemical interaction was converted to a
digital frequency oscillation. The general reaction was analogue to digital and back to
analogue. A fundamental question is, could the same response be obtained by bypassing the initial chemical (analogue) input and stimulate the cell directly with and electromagnetic signal at these same frequencies [NB: IE can we preclude the use of a drug/chemical agent/ neurotransmitter all together and merely use EMF to produce the same effect?].
The results of this experiment certainly indicate that a narrow specific frequency may be required to obtain specific results.
https://archive.org/…/Low-Intensity%20Conflict%20and%20Mode…
https://archive.org/stream/LowIntensityConflictAndModernTechnology/Low-Intensity%20Conflict%20and%20Modern%20Technology_djvu.txt
😈💩👎
A United States Air force report from 1986 that discusses details of the military applications of EMF at different frequencies, amplitudes, pulsed waves, wave-forms etc. For anyone thinking the concerns over 5G are all "Conspiracy Woo", here's a few extracts.
"The results of many studies that have been published in the last few years indicate
that specific biological effects can be achieved by controlling the various parameters of the electromagnetic (EM) field. A few of the more important EMF factors that can be manipulated are frequency, wave shape, rate of pulse onset,
pulse duration, pulse amplitude, repetition rate, secondary modulation, and symmetry and asymmetry of the pulse.......
Effects-
- Electro-anaesthesia.
- Electro-convulsive therapy.
- Behaviour modification in animals.
- Altered electroencephalograms in animals and humans.
- Altered brain morphology in animals.
- Effects of acupuncture.
- Treatment of drug addiction.
- Electro-stimulation for relief of pain.
- Altered firing of neuronal cells.
These are but a few of the many biological effects and uses that have been reported
over the past decade. They are not exhaustive and do not include many of the effects
reported in the Soviet and East European literature.
Currently available data allow the projection that specially generated radio-frequency radiation
(RFR) fields may pose powerful and revolutionary antipersonnel military threats. Electroshock therapy indicates the ability of induced electric current to completely interrupt mental functioning for short periods of time, to obtain cognition for longer periods and to "Restructure emotional response over prolonged intervals" [NB: is this happening now? Is this possibly why ppl react so emotionally over small issues? If it was/wasn't happening......how would we know in environments polluted with EMF from so many sources?)
Experience with electroshock therapy. RFR experiments and the increasing understanding of the brain as an electrically mediated organ suggested the serious probability that impressed electromagnetic fields can be disruptive to purposeful behaviour and may be capable of directing and/or interrogating such behaviour.
Further, the passage of approximately 100 milliamperes through the myocardium can lead to cardiac standstill and death, again pointing to a speed-of-light weapons effect.
A rapidly scanning RFR system could provide an 'effective stun or kill capability' over a 'large area'.
System effectiveness will be a function of wave form, field intensity, pulse widths, repetition
frequency, and carrier frequency. The system can be developed using tissue and whole animal experimental studies, coupled with mechanisms and waveform effects research.
Using relatively low-level RFR, it may be possible to 'sensitise large military groups' to extremely
dispersed amounts of 'biological or chemical agents' [NB: like those in meds/vaccines?] to which the 'un-irradiated population would be immune'
[Nb: so, in theory, a load of political types could hang out in a newly 5G EMF proofed refurbished Parliament building ensuring their own immunity, whilst subjecting a population to a 'highly dispersed' biological//chemical agent which renders them sick? Perhaps the xeno-oestrogen in our environment are having a modulated/enhanced effect bcos of EMF levels, which in themselves also reduce testosterone production by 26% ....could this be a factor in the explosion of kids wanting to swap sex/gender? What with EMF capacity to, and I quote 'Restructure emotional responses' ie 'Feelings']
potential applications of artificial electromagnetic fields are wide ranging and
can be used in many military or quasi-military situations.
Some of these potential uses include dealing with terrorist groups, crowd control,
controlling breeches of security at military installations, and antipersonnel
techniques in tactical warfare. In all of these cases the EM systems would be used to
produce mild to severe physiological disruption or perceptual distortion or
disorientation. In addition the ability of individuals to function could be degraded to
such a point that they would be combat ineffective. Another advantage of
electromagnetic systems is that they can provide coverage over large areas with a
single system. They are silent and countermeasures to them may be difficult to
develop. Assuming that electromagnetic radiation can be controlled to produce a
specific adverse biological effect.
Recently, pulsed electromagnetic fields have been reported to induce cellular transcription. At the other end of the non-ionising spectrum, research reports are also showing biological effects that are not predicted by classical theories. For example, Kremer and others have published several papers showing that low-
intensity millimetre waves [NB: 5G] produce biological effects. They have also shown that
not only are the effects seen at 'Very low power' but they are also frequency specific.
Current research in chaotic behaviour has shown that the alternation of only one parameter to a critical phase can induce chaotic behaviour with drastic outcomes. It is not too difficult to envision that electromagnetic systems could interact with the electrical signal in cardiac muscle. If the proper parameters were utilised, several possible results could be produced. These include auricular or ventricular fibrillation, or complete asystole with a resultant fatal outcome.
Past research has shown both altered behaviour in animals and altered electroencephalograms (EEG) in both humans and animals. What these EEG changes mean in practical terms to humans at the present time is difficult to say,
since we still lack a great deal of knowledge and there is much controversy about what a "normal" EEG means. It is currently impossible to understand and to predict how an altered EEG can influence behaviour and the cognitive processes of an individual.
Some current research provides a few clues that altering brain waves can have a major impact on a person's cognitive and overt behaviour. In this regard, some people have even speculated that electromagnetism has already been used for
this purpose.
Some recent theoretical research has looked at the classical neuronal synapse and proposed that the size of the synaptic space is so small that rather than a pure chemical event taking place, it must be a quantum mechanical event.
These quantum mechanical events, being statistical in nature and depending upon
cross talk from other cells instead of a pure internal electrical conductance within the
single cell, infer that the complex system will be susceptible to external nonlinear electromagnetic influences. The disruption of neural pathways can lead to a multitude of effects.
With today's sophisticated weapon systems, one does not have to totally disable individuals to render them ineffective for combat. For example, if their timing is altered or their cognitive processes are degraded these individuals may be unable to operate their equipment (fly their aircraft, make the proper
decision with computer-operated systems, or successfully complete related action).
Because of the many parameters involved and the apparent specificity of each parameter, one can tailor a specific response.
The ability to have this kind of flexibility provides an enormous range of options to the user. It opens the door for providing an appropriate response in warfare, be it conventional or unconventional.
There are still many unanswered questions concerning this technology. To date, the
vast majority of research done in this country has focused on using single frequency
sources with standard parameters. No one has used multiple frequencies during a
single exposure, nor has anyone tried to manipulate the parameters to produce
biological effects. Up to the present time the majority of scientists in the United
States have assumed that a "microwave is a microwave," and research done at one
frequency would be applicable to any frequency in the same region. We now know
that the experiment must be frequency specific, but how specific?
Does this change for various portions of the electromagnetic spectrum?
There are unconfirmed reports that a change of .01 hertz can make a difference. Most scientists still do not believe that this small a change in frequency will make a difference. Yet, Rapp has
shown that a frequency-encoded signal can act as a trigger for the release of amylase
from the salivary glands of the blowfly (Calliphora exythocephalla). The variation
in the frequency that modified the release of the enzyme was from 0.00 hertz to 0.056 hertz. In this study the stimulus was the chemical 5-hydroxytryptaime.
What is of particular interest is that the original chemical interaction was converted to a
digital frequency oscillation. The general reaction was analogue to digital and back to
analogue. A fundamental question is, could the same response be obtained by bypassing the initial chemical (analogue) input and stimulate the cell directly with and electromagnetic signal at these same frequencies [NB: IE can we preclude the use of a drug/chemical agent/ neurotransmitter all together and merely use EMF to produce the same effect?].
The results of this experiment certainly indicate that a narrow specific frequency may be required to obtain specific results.
https://archive.org/…/Low-Intensity%20Conflict%20and%20Mode…
https://archive.org/stream/LowIntensityConflictAndModernTechnology/Low-Intensity%20Conflict%20and%20Modern%20Technology_djvu.txt
