5g pdf's and links to data sets
The Oscillatorium sets out all these EMF effects on the brain in full, but here are some highlights from recent reports:
The blood-brain barrier is compromised by EMF exposure, allowing toxic molecules into the brain[xxiii]
The culprit for increases in neurological diseases with a shift to the younger person is microwave and other EMF exposure, linked to excessive vaccinations that lead to neurodegeneration[xxiv]
Radiofrequency radiation exposure can remove calcium ions (positively charged calcium ions) from cell membranes in the brain, destabilizing the membrane and resulting in serious metabolic and neurological damage
Children living less than 1 km from a cell phone tower in San Francisco in 2000 were found to have 31 times the rate of brain cancer as children in the rest of the city[xxvi]
Oscillating signals interfere with the brain very significantly and can change the EEG. If a system can oscillate and an oscillating signal comes in, it can resonantly be absorbed. It is what an aerial does, it is what a cell phone does, it is what is used in telecommunications
Near-field radiofrequency radiation from mobile phones is linked to malignant gliomas of the brain[xxviii]
Millennials are experiencing an unprecedented decline in their health when they reach their late 20s
Could these devastating findings have anything to do with cell phone manufacturers irradiating adults, children and fetuses way over even the already astronomically high permitted limits? French NGO Alert Phonegate has established that for years “smart” phones have been irradiating users at levels far above the limits and the Chicago Tribune has established that the same has been happening in the US. Australian barrister Ray Broomhall has revealed that children are being exposed to magnetic fields from cell phones that breach WHO’s recommended 0.3μT safety limit by a factor of 20,000(slide show). Meanwhile, a new European directive (2014/53/EU) relaxes controls by allowing manufacturers to self-certify their products.
Writer and brain-tumour-survivor Olga Sheean, who is acutely affected by electromagnetic radiation, describes feeling “ill, confused, lethargic and many other things that you can’t even articulate because this radiation scrambles the brain and dulls the senses—and I have experienced this when exposed to strong microwaves in WiFi zones”.[xxxiii]
Professor Neil Cherry’s research persuaded him that electromagnetic fields and radiation damage DNA and enhance cell death rates and that they are therefore a ubiquitous universal genotoxic carcinogen that enhances the rates of cancer, cardiac, reproductive and neurological disease and mortality in human populations. Therefore there is no safe threshold level. The only safe exposure level is zero, a position confirmed by dose-response trends in epidemiological studies.
Proof of insanity: rolling out 5G is the action of disturbed minds
The global electric circuit
The International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space explains the global electric circuit on which we depend for our well-being:
The Earth, the ionosphere and the lower atmosphere form the global electric circuit[xxxiv]in which we live. It is well established that biological rhythms—of humans,[xxxv],[xxxvi] birds,[xxxvii] hamsters,[xxxviii] and spiders[xxxix],[xl]—are controlled by the Earth’s natural electromagnetic environment and that the well-being of all organisms depends on the stability of this environment, including the electrical properties of the atmosphere.[xli],[xlii],[xliii],[xliv] Cherry, in a groundbreaking paper,[xlv] explained the importance of the Schumann resonances[xlvi] and why ionospheric disturbances can alter blood pressure and melatonin and cause “cancer, reproductive, cardiac and neurological disease and death”.
These elements of our electromagnetic environment have already been altered by radiation from power lines. Power line harmonic radiation[xlvii] reaches the Earth’s ionosphere and magnetosphere, where it is amplified by wave-particle interactions.[xlviii],[xlix] In 1985, Dr. Robert O. Becker warned that power line harmonic radiation had already changed the structure of the magnetosphere, and that the continued expansion of this effect “threatens the viability of all life on Earth”.[l] The placement of tens of thousands of satellites directly in both the ionosphere and magnetosphere, emitting modulated signals at millions of watts and millions of frequencies, is likely to alter our electromagnetic environment beyond our ability to adapt.[li]
Informal monitoring has already provided evidence indicating serious effects on humans and animals from the approximately 100 satellites that have provided 2G and 3G phone service from low orbit since 1998. Such effects cannot be understood only from consideration of the low levels of radiation on the ground. Knowledge from other relevant scientific disciplines must be taken into account, including the fields of atmospheric physics and acupuncture.[lii],[liii],[liv],[lv] Adding 20,000 5G satellites will further pollute the global electric circuit[lvi],[lvii] and could alter the Schumann resonances,[lviii] with which all life on Earth has evolved. The effects will be universal and may be profoundly damaging.
Are decision-makers fit to make decisions permitting 5G on Earth and in space?
Having established that the left-brain imbalance in the West is undoubtedly greatly exacerbated by massive exposure to electromagnetic radiation, it is pertinent to ask if under these circumstances our decision-makers possess the mental capacity to permit the rollout of 5G, including in space, especially given that they are aware that not a single test of health or safety has been carried out prior to this planned blanket coverage of the Earth with 5G.
It is intended to “blanket” the Earth with artificial electromagnetic radiation ostensibly for the purpose of providing Internet access to all. The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has already given permission for 23,000 5G satellites to be put into space, with SpaceX now having submitted paperwork for 30,000 more. These will operate in low-Earth orbit (1,200 miles (2,000 kms)) and very low Earth orbit (between 208 and 215 miles (335 to 346 kms)). In addition to these 53,000 satellites, it is planned to place High Altitude Pseudo Satellites (HAPS; solar-powered giant wings, airships or balloons)in the stratosphere, and to network civil aviation to provide Internet access on the ground. According to the UN’s Online Index of Objects Launched into Outer Space, there are currently 5,294 satellites in Earth orbit (as of 21 October 2019). The proposed satellites would increase that number by a factor of 10.
SpaceX has also requested permission to operate 1 million Earth stations. These will transmit in the range of 14.0-14.5 GHz (part of the ‘Ku band’) and receive in the range of 10.7-12.7 GHz (part of the ‘X band’). For comparison, current LTE networks operate at 600MHz to 2.5GHz.
Existing threats in space: space debris and weaponization
A major long-term concern among all space-faring nations and the UN is orbital congestion, which currently includes more than 500,000 pieces of debris and is projected to reach over 2 billion by 2025.[lix] The Kessler syndrome posits a cascade of space debris collisions that could make the Earth orbits unusable for many generations.[lx] Some satellites are nuclear-powered, and there have been accidents that have allowed nuclear material to reach Earth (both land and sea) and to load radionuclides in the upper atmosphere, which can in time spiral down to sea-level. With radioisotopes having a half-life of thousands of years, it is possible that eventual harm was caused to the public and environment.[lxi]
Project West Ford in 1961 involved placing in orbit 480 million copper dipole antennas (needles) in orbit to facilitate global radio communication during the Cold War. These needles continue to contribute to the space debris problem. In November 2018, the FCC initiated a comprehensive review of its orbital-debris mitigation rules – after granting permission for several thousand satellites. We are told that more technology to combat technology is being tested, such as ion beams or harpoon nets to capture space debris.
In March this year, India destroyed its own satellite and created debris that was considered a threat to the International space station.
The second major issue of long-term concern is the weaponization of space. The Outer Space Treaty of 1967 enshrined the principle of outer space being preserved as a common heritage of humankind, forbids the stationing of weapons in outer space (art. IV) and binds States parties to conducting all their activities in outer space with due regard for the interests of all other States.[lxii] It also bans the use of nuclear weapons, but was not signed by the US or North Korea. It has long been recognised that the weaponization of outer space for any purpose—whether offensive or defensive, against any space/celestial body or against an Earth-bound target—would effectively turn space objects into potential targets and turn outer space into a potential conflict zone.”[lxiii] Conflict in space is particularly dangerous because the cause of anomalies would be unclear.
Despite this, in February this year, President Trump determined to create a military space force. NATO intends to declare space a “war-fighting domain” this December. France has just announced its own space command to protect French satellites, which will be equipped with machine guns and laser weapons. Sabotage and warfare would target the satellites of other countries.[lxiv] One attack technique would involve deliberately directing broadband radio transmissions to disrupt the communications of the target satellite.
Has the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) system morphed into 5G?
The capabilities of the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) system bear a remarkable resemblance to those of 5G. HAARP is an ionospheric heater that uses banks of antennas arranged in phased arrays with a beam-forming ability. Like 5G, HAARP can be used as a communications system; it has mental-disruption possibilities; it can seriously impair the brain performance of very large populations; it can do voice to skull; it can heat the skin; it can change people’s emotional state, and perhaps even change and manipulate thought and behaviour; and it can create a lethargic or highly energised response as described in the interview below with Dr. Nick Begich, who has written several books on HAARP.[lxv]
Begich is the eldest son of the late United States Congressman from Alaska, Nick Begich Sr. and political activist Pegge Begich. He was twice elected President of both the Alaska Federation of Teachers and the Anchorage Council of Education. He is the author of Angels don’t play this HAARP: Advances in Tesla technology and other books.
A European Union report published on 14 January 1999 refers to the Alaska-based High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) system as a weapon involving environmental manipulation and asked for information from the US on its risk to public health. HAARP was described as a research project using a ground-based apparatus, an array of antennae each powered by its own transmitter, to heat up portions of the ionosphere with powerful radio beams. The energy generated heats up parts of, and makes holes in, the ionosphere, which is what protects us from incoming cosmic radiation. It had links with 50 years of intensive space research for military purposes, including the Star Wars project, to control the upper atmosphere and communications. The report described HAARP as a serious threat to the environment, with an incalculable impact on human life. It described HAARP as being in breach of Convention on the prohibition of military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques, the Antarctic Treaty, the Outer Space Treaty, and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.[lxvi] (Documentary on HAARP with Dr. Nick Begich.Documentary on HAARP from the History Channel.)
