#WakeUp
😈💩👎
The double standards of Facebook and it fake fact checker pages violate their own policy their out right censorship of post and removal of them and your personal messages and notifications also violates this policy and their out right statement of not censoring politicians (wink wink) is a absolute crime against free democracy and freedom, may i suggest you edit your bio and job to politician lol #YourWelcome
Therefore i suggest that we all become politicians so join my party the "Free Peoples Of Earth alliance" and free yourself from censorship #Fact
So if you already blocked LEAD STORIES and their BS fact checker and still taking hits try searching for Poynter its parent organisation and blocking that page to also click the abut page and block team members, same goes for lead stories to and any of the fact checkers, also its interesting to note that fb doesn't fact check politicians (wink wink) and this following section is direct from fb policy what a fucking piss take especially the last section.
Q: HOW DOES THIS APPLY TO POSTS AND ADS FROM POLITICIANS?
A. Posts and ads from politicians are generally not subjected to fact-checking. In evaluating when this applies, we ask our fact-checking partners to look at politicians at every level. This means candidates running for office, current office holders – and, by extension, many of their cabinet appointees – along with political parties and their leaders. In some cases, we ask fact-checkers to use their expertise and judgment to determine whether an individual is a politician, like in the case of a part-time elected official.
Former candidates for office or former officials continue to be covered by our third-party fact-checking programme. That remains true for organisations such as Super PACs or advocacy organisations that are unaffiliated with candidates.
There will be some instances where a false or partly false rating from our fact-checking partners will affect politicians. When a politician shares a specific piece of content – i.e. a link to an article, video or photo created by someone else that has been previously debunked on Facebook – we will demote that content, display a warning and reject its inclusion in ads. This is different from a politician's own claim or statement. If a claim is made directly by a politician on their Page, in an ad or on their website, it is considered direct speech and ineligible for our third-party fact-checking programme – even if the substance of that claim has been debunked elsewhere. Ads about social issues, elections or politics are held to a higher transparency standard on Facebook. All inactive and active ads run by politicians on Facebook will be housed in the publicly available, searchable Ad Library for up to seven years.
Q. WHY ARE POLITICIANS NOT ELIGIBLE?
A. Our approach is grounded in Facebook's fundamental belief in free expression, respect for the democratic process and the belief that, especially in mature democracies with a free press, political speech is the most scrutinised speech there is. Just as critically, by limiting political speech, we would leave people less informed about what their elected officials are saying and leave politicians less accountable for their words.
