no new technology is to be used in this system,its just a fresh application of the principles used in a new way, i have multiple types of propusion systems that i could produce if i had funding or access to automated assembly systems, that would be all "new" and revolutionary concepts and tech know how that would be way more viabl;e and achievable and cheaper than what nasa produce #Fact
a propellantless drive capable of overcoming gravity! Is this discovery for real?
Has UFO Propulsion been decipherEd?
#space #alien #uap
The Biefeld–Brown effect is an electrical phenomenon that produces an ionic wind that transfers its momentum to surrounding neutral particles. It describes a force observed on an asymmetric capacitor when high voltage is applied to the capacitor's electrodes.[1] Once suitably charged up to high DC potentials, a thrust at the negative terminal, pushing it away from the positive terminal, is generated.[2] The effect was named by inventor Thomas Townsend Brown who claimed that he did a series of experiments with professor of astronomy Paul Alfred Biefeld, a former teacher of Brown whom Brown claimed was his mentor and co-experimenter at Denison University in Ohio.[3]
The use of an asymmetric capacitor, with the negative electrode being larger than the positive electrode, allowed for more thrust to be produced in the direction from the low-flux to the high-flux region compared to a conventional capacitor.[2] These asymmetric capacitors became known as Asymmetrical Capacitor Thrusters (ACT).[4] The Biefeld–Brown effect can be observed in ionocrafts and lifters, which utilize the effect to produce thrust in the air without requiring any combustion or moving parts.[1]
In his 1960 patent titled "Electrokinetic Apparatus," Brown refers to electrokinesis to describe the Biefeld–Brown effect, linking the phenomenon to the field of electrohydrodynamics (EHD).[1][2] Brown also believed the Biefeld–Brown effect could produce an anti-gravity force, referred to as "electrogravitics" based on it being an electricity/gravity phenomenon.[5] However, there is little evidence that supports Brown's claim on the effect's anti-gravity properties.[6]
The Biefeld–Brown effect was initially investigated by Thomas Townsend Brown (USA) and Dr. Paul Alfred Biefeld (Germany) in the 1920s. Research continued through the 1950s and 1960s by Brown and other researchers. The use of this electrogravitic propulsion effect was further explored during the publicized era of gravity control propulsion research, which included the United States gravity control propulsion initiative. Research, based upon Thomas Townsend Brown's hypotheses, includes the idea that electrogravitics could be used as a means of propulsion for aircraft and spacecraft. Electrogravitic processes use an electric field to charge or, more properly, polarize an object with a specially-constructed shape. Brown's disks, for example, used an "asymmetrical" capacitor, sketches of which can be found in the literature pertaining to the Biefeld–Brown effect.
An ionocraft or ion-propelled aircraft, commonly known as a lifter or hexalifter, is an electrohydrodynamic (EHD) device (utilizing an electrical phenomenon known as the Biefeld–Brown effect) to produce thrust in the air, without requiring any combustion or moving parts. The term "Ionocraft" dates back to the 1960s, an era in which EHD experiments were at their peak. In its basic form, it simply consists of two parallel conductive electrodes, one in the form of a fine wire and another which may be formed of either a wire grid, tubes or foil skirts with a smooth round surface. When such an arrangement is powered up by high voltage in the range of a few kilovolts, it produces thrust. The ionocraft forms part of the EHD thruster family, but is a special case in which the ionisation and accelerating stages are combined into a single stage.
An EHD (electrohydrodynamic) thruster is a propulsion device based on ionic fluid propulsion, that works without moving parts, using only electrical energy. The principle of ionic (air) propulsion with corona-generated charged particles has been known since the earliest days of the discovery of electricity, with references dating back to year 1709 in a book titled Physico-Mechanical Experiments on Various Subjects by Francis Hauksbee. The first publicly demonstrated tethered model was developed by Major De Seversky in the form of an Ionocraft, a single stage EHD thruster, in which the thruster lifts itself by propelling air downwards. De Seversky contributed much to its basic physics and its construction variations during the year 1960 and has in fact patented his device U.S. Patent 3,130,945 , April 28, 1964). Only electric fields are used in this propulsion method. The basic components of an EHD thruster are two: an ioniser and an ion accelerator. Ionocrafts form part of this category, but their energy conversion efficiency is severely limited to less than 1% by the fact that the ioniser and accelerating mechanisms are not independent. Unlike the ionocraft, within an EHD thruster, the air gap in its second stage is not restricted or related to the Corona discharge voltage of its ionising stage. Unlike related propulsion devices, they need a fluid for their operation and cannot operate in space or vacuum.
Weapons So Terrible They Had To Be Banned From War And Other Weapons Stories (Compilation)
TheInfographicsShow
protocol 3
prohibitions or restrictions on the use of incendiary weapons that is to say any weapon that uses fire or heat as their main offensive capability ,,,, aheeeem ,,,,,"lasers"
The Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Their Additional Protocols In 1949, an international conference of diplomats built on the earlier treaties for the protection of war victims, revising and updating them into four new conventions comprising 429 articles of law—known as the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949. The Additional Protocols of 1977 and 2005 supplement the Geneva Conventions. The Geneva Conventions apply in all cases of declared war, or in any other armed conflict between nations. They also apply in cases where a nation is partially or totally occupied by soldiers of another nation, even when there is no armed resistance to that occupation. Nations that ratify the Geneva Conventions must abide by certain humanitarian principles and impose legal sanctions against those who violate them. Ratifying nations must www.redcross.org/ihl Local civilians may be asked to care for the wounded and sick. “enact any legislation necessary to provide effective penal sanctions for persons committing or ordering to be committed any of the grave breaches (violations)” of the Conventions. The following pages provide a basic overview of the Conventions and Protocols and a quick reference to the legal text of the treaties. For a comprehensive listing of all legal provisions, please refer to the actual treaty documents. The First Geneva Convention The Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field of August 12, 1949. The First Geneva Convention protects soldiers who are hors de combat (out of the battle). The 10 articles of the original 1864 version of the Convention have been expanded in the First Geneva Convention of 1949 to 64 articles that protect the following: • Wounded and sick soldiers • Medical personnel, facilities and equipment • Wounded and sick civilian support personnel accompanying the armed forces • Military chaplains • Civilians who spontaneously take up arms to repel an invasion Specific provisions include: Art. 9 This Convention, like the others, recognizes the right of the ICRC to assist the wounded and sick. Red Cross and Red Crescent national societies, other authorized impartial relief organizations and neutral governments may also provide humanitarian service. Art. 12 The wounded and sick shall be respected and protected without discrimination on the basis of sex, race, nationality, religion, political beliefs or other criteria. Art. 12 The wounded and sick shall not be murdered, exterminated or subjected to torture or biological experiments. Art. 15 The wounded and sick shall receive adequate care. Art. 15 The wounded and sick shall be protected against pillage and ill treatment. Arts. 15-16 All parties in a conflict must search for and collect the wounded and sick, especially after battle, and provide the information concerning them to the Central Tracing and Protection Agency of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). The Second Geneva Convention The Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea of August 12, 1949 The Second Geneva Convention adapts the protections of the First Geneva Convention to reflect conditions at sea. It protects wounded and sick combatants while on board ship or at sea. Its 63 articles apply to the following: • Armed forces members who are 2 Summary of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Their Additional Protocols International Humanitarian Law April 2011 wounded, sick or shipwrecked • Hospital ships and medical personnel • Civilians who accompany the armed forces Specific provisions include: Arts. 12, 18 This Convention mandates that parties in battle take all possible measures to search for, collect and care for the wounded, sick and shipwrecked. “Shipwrecked” refers to anyone who is adrift for any reason, including those forced to land at sea or to parachute from damaged aircraft. Art. 14 While a warship cannot capture a hospital ship’s medical staff, it can hold the wounded, sick and shipwrecked as prisoners of war, providing they can be safely moved and that the warship has the facilities to care for them. Art. 21 Appeals can be made to neutral vessels, including merchant ships and yachts, to help collect and care for the wounded, sick and shipwrecked. Those who agree to help cannot be captured as long as they remain neutral. Art. 22 Hospital ships cannot be used for any military purpose. They cannot be attacked or captured. The names and descriptions of hospital ships must be conveyed to all parties in the conflict. Arts. 36-37 Religious, medical and hospital personnel serving on combat ships must be respected and protected. If captured, they are to be sent back to their side as soon as possible. www.redcross.org/ihl The Third Geneva Convention The Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War of August 12, 1949 The Third Geneva Convention sets out specific rules for the treatment of prisoners of war (POWs). The Convention’s 143 articles require that POWs be treated humanely, adequately housed and receive sufficient food, clothing and medical care. Its provisions also establish guidelines on labor, discipline, recreation and criminal trial. Note that prisoners of war may include the following: • Members of the armed forces • Volunteer militia, including resistance movements • Civilians accompanying the armed forces. Specific provisions include: Arts. 13-14, 16 Prisoners of war must not be subjected to torture or medical experimentation and must be protected against acts of violence, insults and public curiosity. Art. 17 POWs are required to provide to their captors only their name, rank, date of birth and military service number. Art. 23 Female POWs must be treated with the regard due their sex. Arts. 25-27, 30 Captors must not engage in any reprisals or discriminate on the basis of race, nationality, religious beliefs, political opinions or other criteria. Arts. 50, 54 POWs must be housed in clean, adequate shelter, and receive the food, clothing and medical care necessary to maintain good health. They must not be held in combat areas where they are exposed to fire, nor can they be used to “shield” areas from military operations. They may be required to do non military jobs under reasonable working conditions when paid at a fair rate. Arts. 70-72, 123 Names of prisoners of war must be sent immediately to the Central Tracing Agency of the ICRC. POWs are to be allowed to correspond with their families and receive relief packages. Arts. 82, 84 Prisoners are subject to the laws of their captors and can be tried by their captors’ courts. The captor shall ensure fairness, impartiality and a competent advocate for the prisoner. Arts. 109, 110 Seriously ill POWs must be repatriated (returned home). Art. 118 When the conflict ends, all POWs shall be released and, if they request, be sent home without delay. Art. 125 The ICRC is granted special rights to carry out humanitarian activities on behalf of prisoners of war. The ICRC or other impartial humanitarian relief organizations authorized by parties to the conflict must be permitted to visit with prisoners privately, examine conditions of confinement to ensure the Conventions’ standards are being met and distribute relief supplies. 3 Summary of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Their Additional Protocols International Humanitarian Law April 2011 The Fourth Geneva Convention The Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of August 12, 1949 Civilians in areas of armed conflict and occupied territories are protected by the 159 articles of the Fourth Geneva Convention. Specific provisions include: Arts. 13, 32 Civilians are to be protected from murder, torture or brutality, and from discrimination on the basis of race, nationality, religion or political opinion. Art. 14 Hospital and safety zones may be established for the wounded, sick, and aged, children under 15, expectant mothers and mothers of children under seven. Art. 18 Civilian hospitals and their staff are to be protected. Arts. 24, 25 This Convention provides for the care of children who are orphaned or separated from their families. The ICRC’s Central Tracing and Protection Agency is also authorized to transmit family news and assist with family reunifications, with the help of Red Cross and Red Crescent national societies. Art. 27 The safety, honor, family rights, religious practices, manners and customs of civilians are to be respected. Arts. 33-34 Pillage, reprisals, indiscriminate destruction of property and the taking of hostages are prohibited. www.redcross.org/ihl Arts. 33, 49 They are not to be subjected to collective punishment or deportation. Art. 40 Civilians cannot be forced to do military-related work for an occupying force. Art. 54 They are to be paid fairly for any assigned work. Art. 55 Occupying powers are to provide food and medical supplies as necessary to the population and maintain medical and public health facilities. Arts. 55, 58 Medical supplies and objects used for religious worship are to be allowed passage. Art. 59 When that is not possible, they are to facilitate relief shipments by impartial humanitarian organizations such as the ICRC. Red Cross or other impartial humanitarian relief organizations authorized by the parties to the conflict are to be allowed to continue their activities. Art. 64 Public officials will be permitted to continue their duties. Laws of the occupied territory will remain in force unless they present a security threat. Arts. 79-135 If security allows, civilians must be permitted to lead normal lives. They are not to be deported or interned—except for imperative reasons of security. If internment is necessary, conditions should be at least comparable to those set forth for prisoners of war. Arts. 89-91 Internees are to receive adequate food, clothing and medical care, and protected from the dangers of war. Art. 106 Information about internees is to be sent to the Central Tracing Agency. Arts. 108, 107 Internees have the right to send and receive mail and receive relief shipments. Art. 132 Children, pregnant women, mothers with infants and young children, the wounded and sick and those who have been interned for a long time are to be released as soon as possible. Common Article 3 All four Geneva Conventions contain an identical Article 3, extending general coverage to “conflicts not of an international character.” In the case of armed conflict not of an international character occurring in the territory of one of the High Contracting Parties, each Party to the conflict shall be bound to apply, as a minimum, the following provisions: 1. Persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of the armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat (out of the fight) by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction founded on race, color, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other similar criteria. 4 Summary of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Their Additional Protocols International Humanitarian Law April 2011 To this end, the following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever with respect to the above-mentioned persons: (a) Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture; (b) Taking of hostages; (c) Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading treatment; (d) The passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples. 2. The wounded, sick and shipwrecked shall be collected and cared for. An impartial humanitarian body, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, may offer its services to the Parties to the conflict. The Parties to the conflict should further endeavor to bring into force, by means of special agreements, all or part of the other provisions of the present Convention. The application of the preceding provisions shall not affect the legal status of the Parties to the conflict. www.redcross.org/ihl The Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 In 1977, two Protocols supplementary to the Geneva Conventions were adopted by an international diplomatic conference to give greater protection to victims of both international and internal armed conflicts. As of 2010, 170 nations have ratified Protocol I and 165 have ratified Protocol II. Any nation that has ratified the Geneva Conventions but not the Protocols is still bound by all provisions of the Conventions. Protocol I (102 Articles) Protocol additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts Protocol I expands protection for the civilian population as well as military and civilian medical workers in international armed conflicts. Specific provisions include: Arts. 15, 79, Arts. 76-77 Special protections are provided for women, children and civilian medical personnel, and measures of protection for journalists are specified. Arts. 17, 81 The ICRC, national societies or other impartial humanitarian organizations authorized by parties to the conflict must be permitted to provide assistance. Art. 35 Use of weapons that “cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering,” as well as means of warfare that “cause widespread, long-term, and severe damage to the natural environment” are prohibited. Arts. 43-44 Protocol I seeks to clarify the military status of members of guerrilla forces in the following manner: It includes provisions granting combatant and prisoner of war status to members of dissident forces when under the command of a central authority. Such combatants cannot conceal their allegiance; they must be recognizable as combatants while preparing for or during an attack. Arts. 51, 54 It outlaws indiscriminate attacks on civilian populations and destruction of food, water and other materials needed for survival. Arts. 56, 53 Dams, dikes and nuclear generating stations may not be attacked, nor can cultural objects and places of worship. Art. 77 Recruitment of children under age 15 into the armed forces is forbidden. Art. 85 It is a war crime to use one of the protective emblems recognized by the Geneva Conventions to deceive the opposing forces or to use other forms of treachery. 5 Summary of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Their Additional Protocols International Humanitarian Law April 2011 Protocol II (28 Articles) Protocol additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts Protocol II elaborates on protections for victims caught up in high-intensity internal conflicts such as civil wars. It does not apply to such internal disturbances as riots, demonstrations and isolated acts of violence. Protocol II expands and complements the non international protections contained in Article 3 common to all four Geneva Conventions of 1949. Specific provisions include: Art. 4 Persons who do not take a direct part or who have ceased to take part in hostilities are entitled to respect. In all circumstances, they are to be treated humanely. Protocol II specifically prohibits violence to the life, health and physical or mental well-being of people. In particular, it prohibits acts of murder and cruel treatment, terrorism, hostage-taking, slavery, outrages on personal dignity, collective punishment and pillage. These protections are considered fundamental guarantees for all persons. www.redcross.org/ihl Art. 4 Children are to be evacuated to safe areas when possible and reunited with their families. Art. 5 Persons interned or detained during internal conflicts are assured of the same humane treatment as specified by the Geneva Conventions. Art. 7, 9 Strengthens protection of the wounded, sick and shipwrecked as well as medical and religious personnel. Arts. 10-11, Arts. 13-14, Art. 16 Attacks are forbidden on civilians and on “objects indispensable to civilian survival” such as crops, irrigation systems or drinking water sources, cultural objects, and places of worship. Art. 18 Impartial humanitarian relief organizations, such as the ICRC, are to be permitted to continue their humanitarian services
Project Looking Glass | The Time Warriors of the 2012 Apocalypse
The Why Files Project Looking Glass | The Time Warriors of the 2012 Apocalypse You’re not supposed to be alive. None of us are. About 10 years ago, you woke up to an eerie silence. The power was out. You went to check your phone for news but your phone was dead. Then you realized, everything was dead. Some kind of blackout, you thought. You looked out your window, confused. It looked like a normal December morning. Holiday decorations were up, though all the Christmas lights were out. You saw neighbors also peering through windows and standing on their front porches. Everyone was looking up. It looked like the stars were falling. Only, they weren’t stars. They were satellites and space debris. It was raining fire. And for the first time in your life, you saw the aurora borealis … in the middle of the day. You looked at the calendar. Today's date was supposed to mean something, but before you could remember, everything went black. It was December 21st, 2012. The end of the world. #Conspiracy#CIA#TimeTravel
History is filled with events that are too haunting, too controversial, or too dark to make it into the average classroom. This video dives deep into the untold historical facts that you won't find in textbooks. From chilling wartime secrets to unsettling events that shaped the world, we uncover the stories that have been deliberately left out or glossed over.
every system shown here have massive strategic flaws and weaknesses and are not even close to the level of the system's i can produce all of which are highly capable in effectiveness and use economically viable. means eg iron beam can be rendered useless with one simple adaptation to current methods.
This is a video of Israel's Iron Beam directed energy weapon in action: a powerful laser obliterating a drone in mere seconds. The test footage, released by the Israeli government, showcases one of the strongest practical laser combat weapons in existence, with 100 kilowatts of power.
Developed by Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, the system has grown from an initial power of tens of kilowatts when first unveiled in 2016 to 100 kilowatts today – significant enough to incapacitate short-range projectiles such as rockets and UAVs at a distance of 7 to 10 kilometers...
here is the actual 100% proof that the moon landing was totally fake and this s taken from the official NASA footage,,,, i dare you to watch it to the end and if you can do that and still think it's not the truth and the moon landings were genuine I'll gladly offer up my left nut after removing it with a rusty spoon and rolling it in salt and vinegar,,, that's how confident i am of the evidence i have here https://youtu.be/azBs8aiLrp8#IAM#DShow less
In tonight’s video, I react to a scary video compilation that will send chills down your spine. The terrifying TikToks and YouTube Shorts shown in this montage are equally shocking and thought-provoking, causing many on social media to question reality. This grueling compilation features some mysterious celebrity conspiracies, harrowing UFO sightings and plenty of strange creatures. If that's now enough, there are also some unexplained glitches in the matrix that will leave you scratching your head.
June 1984 marked the Soviet Union's ninth mission to its orbital space station, Salyut 7. The mission, launched on Cosmonauts Day, was intended to resupply the station and conduct scientific and technical research.
However, the mission gained more fame not for its scientific endeavors but for a mystifying experience reported by the crew members. The accounts involve an ethereal encounter that occurred 155 days into their 237-day mission.
The day started typically until the cosmonauts reported seeing a "fog" that transformed into an intense, blinding light enveloping their spacecraft. From this celestial luminescence, they claimed to have witnessed the appearance of seven angelic figures, each comparable in size to an airliner, with a serene expression and outstretched wings.
These beings supposedly remained visible for 10 minutes, silently moving outside the station before disappearing.
This wasn't an isolated incident either; the 'angels' were said to have reappeared a week later when the space station was joined by another team of three from Soyuz T-12.
The cosmonauts were seasoned professionals, not prone to hysteria or hallucinations. Many were experienced pilots and engineers, and two were physicians. They had undergone rigorous psychological testing to withstand the mental challenges of long-duration space travel. Yet all six reported seeing the same entities, which lent credibility to the account.
Scientists on Earth have proposed theories to explain this celestial mystery, ranging from the plausible to the outlandish. Some have suggested a mass hallucination induced by high carbon dioxide levels, a common issue in space stations.
Others pointed towards a phenomenon called "cosmic rays visual phenomena," where high-energy particles stimulate optic nerves, causing flashes of light. Some insisted it was a psychological coping mechanism for the harsh isolation and monotonous environment of space.
Despite the scrutiny and countless hypotheses, no definitive explanation has emerged...
In 1958, Cold War tensions were simmering, and the Soviets appeared to be winning the all-important space race, thanks to their successful launch of Sputnik 1 the previous year.
Fearful of a demoralized public in the face of Soviet success, the United States government responded with a program named ‘A Study of Lunar Research Flights,’ AKA ‘Project A119’.
This project, which remained top secret and highly guarded by the government and military for many years, sought to make a statement -- an unprecedented demonstration of power that the world would never forget.
The plan was to detonate a nuclear device on the surface of the moon.
While bombing the moon would have answered some astro geological and astronomical questions which puzzled NASA at the time, the main goal was to create an explosion so immense that it could be perceived by the naked human eye all the way from Earth, thereby demonstrating the might of the American nuclear and space programs.
Despite the brutal nature of this gesture, precision would be needed; it was essential that the bomb did not detonate inside an existing crater, or else Earth’s view of it would be obscured.
Some concerns were raised, such as the formation of nuclear fallout on the moon, which would render it uninhabitable should mankind wish to colonize it in the near future. Another potential issue was that the execution of this plan may have led to the widespread militarization of space, further escalating geopolitical tensions. A large enough explosion may even have directed debris toward Earth.
Amongst the small team assembled to put the plan into action was a young Carl Sagan, who was tasked with predicting the effects of a nuclear explosion in a low-gravity vacuum.
It was decided that a conventional hydrogen bomb would have been too heavy to propel, so a 1.7-kiloton W25 missile was chosen. The W25 was to detonate on the shadowed portion of the moon facing Earth, creating a cloud of dust that would catch the sun’s light and therefore be visible.
Development moved quickly, and the launch was predicted to be ready by the following year.
Ultimately, the launch of the W25 never went ahead, with one statement claiming that “Air Force officials decided its risks outweighed its benefits.” NASA and the government instead decided to focus on landing a man on the moon, which they knew would be a more popular accomplishment with the people.
Documents pertaining to Project A119 were revealed following a freedom of information request in 1999, but the US government has never formally acknowledged its involvement. A British nuclear historian stated years later that, quote, "had they gone ahead, we would never have had the romantic image of Neil Armstrong taking 'one giant leap for mankind.'"
